Page 74 4-20ncm-108Pages.pdf Full Version
							
                                Water and Oil Repellent Finishing of Textiles by UV Curing
the color differences are lower on Ole-
ophobol compared to Pymasil. It was
true also if the products were applied
by thermal process. The dispersion of
values was similar but for Pymasil the
values were generally higher. Moreover
for Pymasil there was also some influ-
ence of the product add-on, with a col-
or difference higher if the add-on was
higher. This parameter was unaffect-
ing for Oleophobol.
The concentration of the finishing agent
was the less influencing parameter on
the final samples. As expected, best
results were found with lower product
concentrations, while the final color
was affected increasing this concen-
tration. As previously, it was not con-
firmed for Oleophobol, that was unaf-
fected by the product concentration.
Irradiance
The best results were obtained on sam-
ples treated with the higher irradiance,
improved even with respect to those
thermally treated. The worst results,
that is the most evident color differ-
ence after the treatment, were obtained
on samples radiated with the lower UV
irradiance. The most important effect
was revealed on VIS fabric.
Aging Tests
The stability upon aging of the photo-
grafting treatment was checked. Re-
sistance to aging was tested by mea-
suring the contact angle on 20 g/L Ole-
ophobol-treated samples, two years
after the surface treatment. The sam-
ples were stored in the laboratory at
room temperature in the dark. The com-
parison of CA with water and oil be-
tween freshly prepared samples and
aged samples is reported in Figure 8
for all the fabrics and irradiance val-
ues.
The aged samples were still found hy-
drophobic, with an average 15% reduc-
tion of the water contact angle regard-
less the irradiance. Moreover, the aged
samples were still found oil repellent,
but an average 40% reduction of the
oil contact angles was measured. The
worst results were obtained on VIS,while on COT fabrics the decrease was
lower. The partial loss of oil repellency
can be due Coatings 2017, 7, 60 10 of
12 to a rearrangement and orientation
toward the inner part of the fibers of
the surface fluorine chains, occurred
during this time and mainly ascribable
to some moisture content [23].aging time samples (two years) UV
treated with Oleophobol showed only
a low hydrophobicity decrease com-
pared to fresh samples, while the loss
of oil repellency was higher. Neverthe-
less, aged samples, particularly cot-
ton, can still be considered oil repel-
lent.
ConclusionsIn conclusion, UV curing appears to
be a valid alternative to the finishing
thermal process actually applied at in-
dustrial level. By UV curing, in fact,
same or even better water and oil re-
pellency than thermal process were
obtained, applying a low amount of fin-
ishing agent. It enables the better main-
tenance of textile properties coupled
with the low process temperature, with
a clear economic advantage.In this work, various textile fabrics
were coated with silicone and fluoro-
carbon-based resins by photo-curing
using ultraviolet irradiation. A semi-in-
dustrial scale-up of the process was
carried out: A great number (about 180)
of large fabric samples were padded
with Oleophobol or Pymasil finishing
agents and then were irradiated in air
by UV light with tunable irradiance.
Samples were exposed to radiation on
one side for 60 s. The add-on of vari-
ous finishing agents was kept low to
reduce the treatment cost. White and
dyed samples of different textile com-
position were treated and evaluated in
terms of conferred repellency, yellow-
ing, or color changes. The most rele-
vant process parameters were investi-
gated, considering the thermal process
normally adopted at industrial level as
reference. The results were statistical-
ly evaluated by ANOVA with Minitab
16 software, to point out the most in-
fluencing parameters and the real pos-
sibility of replacing the thermal treat-
ment with UV.
Water and oil drop absorption times
higher than 120 min were found on all
Oleophobol-treated samples, showing
that Oleophobol works very well as oil
and water repellent agent for textiles.
UV process was revealed to work bet-
ter than the thermal one, in fact higher
water and oil contact angles were ob-
tained with a lower amount (1% o.w.f.)
of finishing agent. Considering the UV
process, best results were yielded by
white fabrics, rather than dyed, and
medium values of both irradiance and
product concentration, taking into ac-
count both contact angles and color
reflectance evaluations. Finally, contact
angle measurements carried out on long
NCM-APRIL 2020
74Among UV treated samples, the type
and color of treated fabrics had great
influence on the obtained results, in
particular for Pymasil; the best results
were obtained by lowering the product
concentration, while a negligible effect
was due to different irradiance values.
Finally, UV light caused lower yellow-
ing compared to thermal treatment, with
appreciable values just on viscose at
higher radiation doses, due to the light-
ness of the fabric.
Obtained results were considered en-
couraging and can open the way for a
real application of the UV process to
industrial field.
Supplementary Materials: The follow-
ing are available online at http://
www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/7/5/60/s1.
Table S1: Correspondence between
Minitab codes and process parameters
for the plots of Figures from S1 to S8.
Figure S1: Matrix Plot on average val-
ues of water and oil CA on Oleophobol-
treated samples by UV radiation, Fig-
ure S2: Interaction Plot for water CA
on Oleophobol-treated samples, Figure
S3: Interaction Plot for oil CA on Ole-
ophobol-treated samples, Figure S4:
Main effect plot for water CA on Ole-
ophobol-treated samples, Figure S5:
Main effect plot for oil CA on Ole-
ophobol-treated samples, Figure S6:
Interaction plot for water CA on Pyma-